We vote for water!

Water privatization refers to the transfer of control and ownership of water resources and services from the public sector to private companies.


Privatization of water is likely to lead to:

  • Increased efficiency and effectiveness: Private, profit-driven companies can introduce innovative technologies and management practices to optimize processing, distribution and service delivery.
  • Investments in infrastructure: Privatization can lead to investment, the upgrading of old infrastructure, and the implementation of new technologies improving the quality of water services.
  • Specialisation: Private companies are likely to bring expertise and specialized knowledge in implementing best practices for effective water resource management.
  • Financial viability: Private companies can generate revenue and operate on a more commercial basis than public ones. These revenues can be invested in infrastructure maintenance and upgrading, ensuring the long-term sustainability of water supply, irrigation, etc. services.
  • Accountability and performance incentives: Private companies are usually held accountable through contractual agreements and performance targets. These contracts may include penalties for non-compliance with quality of service standards, performance benchmarks and environmental regulations.
  • Flexibility and adaptability: Privatization can provide flexibility to adapt to changing needs and demands. Private companies may be more responsive to customer feedback and market signals, allowing them to adjust services, prices and infrastructure investments accordingly.


On the other hand, keeping water under public control ensures the following:

  • Affordable price: Privatization can drive up costs, making water less affordable for low-income communities.
  • Access to water: Private companies may prioritize profit over ensuring access to water for all, potentially leaving marginalized populations without affordable and reliable water services.
  • Democratic control: Privatization can reduce public control and decision-making power over water resources. Citizens may have limited say on important issues such as pricing, allocation and environmental sustainability, as these decisions are often made by private actors focused on maximizing profits.
  •   Quality and safety: There are concerns that private companies may prioritize cost-cutting measures, potentially compromising water quality and safety standards. Profit-oriented practices could lead to insufficient maintenance, reduced investment or neglect of environmental parameters.
  • Equal distribution and justice: Critics argue that privatization can exacerbate inequalities in water access, particularly in regions or communities that already face water scarcity or socio-economic challenges. Private companies may focus on areas with higher profitability, leaving underserved areas without adequate infrastructure or water services.
  • Transparency and Accountability: The transition from public to private ownership may raise concerns about transparency and accountability. Private companies may not be subject to the same level of public scrutiny, making it more difficult to ensure that their actions are aligned with the larger public interest.
  • Avoiding Monopoly: Privatization can lead to the consolidation of water resources and services under a single private company or a few dominant players. This concentration of power can limit competition and reduce consumer choice, potentially leading to monopolistic control of key resources.


Given the diverse range of views and experiences regarding water privatization, it is important to carefully consider the local context, weigh potential benefits and drawbacks, and engage in informed public debate when making decisions about water management and service delivery .

A comprehensive approach should prioritize equitable access, sustainability, affordability and long-term public interest.

We vote for water!